Public votes
The public votes of the 17th legislature, with their official count and each deputy’s vote.
9,459 votes match.
-
A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to…
RejectedFor 51Against 222Abstention 2275 voters of 576 deputies in office (47.7 %) -
Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).
AdoptedFor 339Against 174Abstention 11524 voters of 576 deputies in office (91.0 %) -
A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to…
RejectedFor 105Against 185Abstention 0290 voters of 576 deputies in office (50.3 %) -
Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).
AdoptedFor 145Against 0Abstention 6151 voters of 576 deputies in office (26.2 %) -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 150Against 0Abstention 0150 voters of 576 deputies in office (26.0 %) -
Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).
AdoptedFor 204Against 180Abstention 24408 voters of 576 deputies in office (70.8 %) -
Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).
AdoptedFor 206Against 181Abstention 25412 voters of 576 deputies in office (71.5 %) -
Procedural vote on the conduct of the sitting; it is not about the substance of the text.
AdoptedFor 175Against 110Abstention 3288 voters of 576 deputies in office (50.0 %) -
A second deliberation puts to the vote again provisions already voted during the examination of the text (article 101 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly).
RejectedFor 118Against 167Abstention 2287 voters of 576 deputies in office (49.8 %) -
Article 2, committee text no. 1246 : (Non modifié) La présente loi organique s’applique à compter du premier renouvellement général des conseils municipaux suivant sa promulgation.
AdoptedFor 164Against 116Abstention 8288 voters of 576 deputies in office (50.0 %) -
According to its authors : Cet amendement modifie la disposition adoptée au Sénat, qui vise à prévoir l’entrée en vigueur de la proposition de loi organique à compter du prochain renouvellement général des conseils municipaux, par alignement avec…
RejectedFor 120Against 160Abstention 5285 voters of 576 deputies in office (49.5 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 126Against 166Abstention 11303 voters of 576 deputies in office (52.6 %) -
Article 5, committee text no. 1245 : (Non modifié) La présente loi s’applique à compter du premier renouvellement général des conseils municipaux suivant sa promulgation, à l’exception de l’article 3 bis, qui entre en vigueur le lendemain de sa publication.
AdoptedFor 170Against 132Abstention 17319 voters of 576 deputies in office (55.4 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 169Against 146Abstention 3318 voters of 576 deputies in office (55.2 %) -
Article 5, committee text no. 1245 : (Non modifié) La présente loi s’applique à compter du premier renouvellement général des conseils municipaux suivant sa promulgation, à l’exception de l’article 3 bis, qui entre en vigueur le lendemain de sa publication.
AdoptedFor 275Against 26Abstention 1302 voters of 576 deputies in office (52.4 %) -
According to its authors : Cet amendement modifie la disposition adoptée au Sénat, qui vise à prévoir l’entrée en vigueur de la proposition de loi organique à compter du prochain renouvellement général des conseils municipaux, par alignement avec…
AdoptedFor 142Against 141Abstention 1284 voters of 576 deputies in office (49.3 %) -
According to its authors : Cet amendement modifie la disposition adoptée au Sénat, qui vise à prévoir l’entrée en vigueur de la proposition de loi organique à compter du prochain renouvellement général des conseils municipaux, par alignement avec…
RejectedFor 124Against 157Abstention 3284 voters of 576 deputies in office (49.3 %) -
According to its authors : Cet amendement de suppression est en cohérence avec les précédents amendements de suppression. Il est proposé de supprimer intégralement cette proposition de loi.
RejectedFor 100Against 150Abstention 2252 voters of 576 deputies in office (43.8 %) -
According to its authors : Cet amendement de suppression est en cohérence avec les précédents amendements de suppression. Il est proposé de supprimer intégralement cette proposition de loi.
RejectedFor 20Against 148Abstention 84252 voters of 576 deputies in office (43.8 %) -
According to its authors : Cet amendement de suppression est en cohérence avec les précédents amendements de suppression. Il est proposé de supprimer intégralement cette proposition de loi.
RejectedFor 59Against 149Abstention 42250 voters of 576 deputies in office (43.4 %) -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 149Against 104Abstention 12265 voters of 576 deputies in office (46.0 %) -
According to its authors : Le présent amendement du Groupe DR vise à supprimer l’article 1er du projet de loi, qui prévoit d’étendre le scrutin de liste aux communes de moins de 1 000 habitants afin de promouvoir la parité. Si l’objectif d’une…
RejectedFor 11Against 239Abstention 15265 voters of 576 deputies in office (46.0 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 93Against 153Abstention 10256 voters of 576 deputies in office (44.4 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 26Against 139Abstention 82247 voters of 576 deputies in office (42.9 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 99Against 140Abstention 6245 voters of 576 deputies in office (42.5 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 101Against 146Abstention 2249 voters of 576 deputies in office (43.2 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 94Against 142Abstention 9245 voters of 576 deputies in office (42.5 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 92Against 141Abstention 6239 voters of 576 deputies in office (41.5 %) -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 138Against 105Abstention 16259 voters of 576 deputies in office (45.0 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 108Against 142Abstention 5255 voters of 576 deputies in office (44.3 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 105Against 150Abstention 3258 voters of 576 deputies in office (44.8 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 109Against 146Abstention 2257 voters of 576 deputies in office (44.6 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 106Against 147Abstention 3256 voters of 576 deputies in office (44.4 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 104Against 145Abstention 5254 voters of 576 deputies in office (44.1 %) -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 152Against 107Abstention 3262 voters of 576 deputies in office (45.5 %) -
According to its authors : Amendement de repli. Pour les communes de moins de 1000 habitants situées en milieu rural, il est impossible de respecter les mêmes dispositions spéciales applicables aux communes de 1000 habitants et plus, notamment en…
RejectedFor 99Against 149Abstention 9257 voters of 576 deputies in office (44.6 %) -
According to its authors : L'amendement vise à exclure les communes de moins de 500 habitants du dispositif
RejectedFor 104Against 135Abstention 2241 voters of 576 deputies in office (41.8 %) -
According to its authors : L’uniformisation du mode de scrutin telle que prévue par cette proposition de loi, à moins d’un an des prochaines élections municipales, impose des contraintes lourdes qui risquent de perturber le fonctionnement des…
RejectedFor 99Against 128Abstention 1228 voters of 576 deputies in office (39.6 %) -
According to its authors : Amendement de repli visant à exclure les communes de moins de 200 habitants des effets de la présente proposition de loi. L’harmonisation du mode de scrutin tel que présenté par cette proposition de loi constitue, à…
RejectedFor 98Against 130Abstention 3231 voters of 576 deputies in office (40.1 %) -
According to its authors : L’uniformisation du mode de scrutin telle que prévue par cette proposition de loi représente, à moins d’un an des prochaines élections municipales, une contrainte majeure qui risque de peser lourdement sur le…
RejectedFor 98Against 130Abstention 2230 voters of 576 deputies in office (39.9 %) -
According to its authors : L’harmonisation du mode de scrutin tel que présenté par cette proposition de loi constitue, à moins d’un an des futures élections municipales, une somme de contraintes de taille qui vont indéniablement peser sur le bon…
RejectedFor 98Against 130Abstention 2230 voters of 576 deputies in office (39.9 %) -
According to its authors : Le présent amendement vise à conserver l’actuel scrutin majoritaire dans les petites communes de moins de 500 habitants. Actuellement, l’article L. 252 du code électoral prévoit que le scrutin majoritaire s’applique…
RejectedFor 22Against 139Abstention 83244 voters of 576 deputies in office (42.4 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 28Against 180Abstention 44252 voters of 576 deputies in office (43.8 %) -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 104Against 145Abstention 1250 voters of 576 deputies in office (43.4 %) -
Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).
AdoptedFor 72Against 0Abstention 072 voters of 575 deputies in office (12.5 %) -
According to its authors : Par cet amendement, les député.es du groupe LFI-NFP souhaitent réduire la durée du seuil d'emprisonnement à 9 mois. Nous nous opposons au principe même des peines plancher. Cependant, prévoir une peine d'un an sans…
RejectedFor 31Against 45Abstention 076 voters of 575 deputies in office (13.2 %) -
According to its authors : Cet amendement vise à supprimer l'article unique de la présente proposition de loi. Les rédacteurs de cet amendement considèrent que les peines plancher portent atteinte au principe d’individualisation de la peine. Au…
RejectedFor 32Against 50Abstention 082 voters of 575 deputies in office (14.3 %) -
Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).
AdoptedFor 63Against 42Abstention 2107 voters of 575 deputies in office (18.6 %) -
According to its authors : Par cet amendement, le groupe LFI-NFP souhaite modifier le titre de la présente proposition de loi afin de le rendre plus fidèle aux conséquences qu’entraînera son adoption. Les greffiers assurent un travail…
RejectedFor 25Against 69Abstention 8102 voters of 575 deputies in office (17.7 %) -
According to its authors : Par cet amendement, le groupe LFI-NFP souhaite modifier le titre de la présente proposition de loi afin de le rendre plus fidèle aux conséquences qu’entraînera son adoption. Endémique, la surpopulation carcérale…
RejectedFor 26Against 66Abstention 9101 voters of 575 deputies in office (17.6 %)