Public votes
The public votes of the 17th legislature, with their official count and each deputy’s vote.
What the members of the Horizons & Indépendants group did on the day of each vote
For each vote, the deputies who belonged to the HOR group on the day of the vote, from their dated memberships, and what each one did. No position is given to the group as such. “No position recorded” means neither against, nor abstention, nor absence. For a motion of censure, only votes for are recorded.
9,459 votes match.
-
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 32Against 68Abstention 9Members of the HOR group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 117Against 0Abstention 0Members of the HOR group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 103Against 24Abstention 0Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 79Against 39Abstention 8Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 79Against 35Abstention 8Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 89Against 35Abstention 4Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 77Against 39Abstention 3Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 78Against 54Abstention 1Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 31Against 101Abstention 0Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 30Against 98Abstention 2Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 53Against 13Abstention 58Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 106Against 8Abstention 11Members of the HOR group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 107Against 15Abstention 1Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 121Against 1Abstention 3Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 22Against 70Abstention 1Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 18Against 30Abstention 33Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 48Against 18Abstention 5Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 38Against 123Abstention 1Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 39Against 123Abstention 0Members of the HOR group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 90Against 13Abstention 25Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 31Against 111Abstention 0Members of the HOR group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 43Against 29Abstention 66Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 83Against 33Abstention 23Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 54Against 34Abstention 61Members of the HOR group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 101Against 25Abstention 14Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 92Against 46Abstention 0Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 38Against 99Abstention 3Members of the HOR group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 94Against 42Abstention 2Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 81Against 51Abstention 4Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 44Against 93Abstention 5Members of the HOR group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
RejectedFor 56Against 93Abstention 2Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 42Against 100Abstention 1Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 46Against 97Abstention 0Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 41Against 98Abstention 3Members of the HOR group that day -
A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.
RejectedFor 8Against 120Abstention 4Members of the HOR group that day -
A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.
RejectedFor 38Against 93Abstention 5Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 51Against 85Abstention 2Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 25Against 58Abstention 0Members of the HOR group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
RejectedFor 57Against 60Abstention 33Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 73Against 103Abstention 2Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 54Against 123Abstention 0Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 48Against 125Abstention 1Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 41Against 69Abstention 65Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 58Against 131Abstention 0Members of the HOR group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 175Against 18Abstention 5Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 165Against 28Abstention 3Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 152Against 23Abstention 10Members of the HOR group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 139Against 49Abstention 4Members of the HOR group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 94Against 1Abstention 77Members of the HOR group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 106Against 75Abstention 0Members of the HOR group that day