Public votes
The public votes of the 17th legislature, with their official count and each deputy’s vote.
What the members of the Socialistes et apparentés group did on the day of each vote
For each vote, the deputies who belonged to the SOC group on the day of the vote, from their dated memberships, and what each one did. No position is given to the group as such. “No position recorded” means neither against, nor abstention, nor absence. For a motion of censure, only votes for are recorded.
9,459 votes match.
-
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 115Against 40Abstention 12Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 143Against 3Abstention 25Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 64Against 86Abstention 23Members of the SOC group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 120Against 54Abstention 13Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 191Against 2Abstention 2Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 121Against 53Abstention 12Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 58Against 145Abstention 6Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 121Against 66Abstention 2Members of the SOC group that day -
A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.
RejectedFor 60Against 127Abstention 1Members of the SOC group that day -
A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.
RejectedFor 57Against 127Abstention 2Members of the SOC group that day -
A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.
RejectedFor 56Against 125Abstention 2Members of the SOC group that day -
A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.
RejectedFor 57Against 123Abstention 4Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 78Against 42Abstention 7Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 17Against 74Abstention 0Members of the SOC group that day -
la deuxième partie projet de loi de financement de la sécurité sociale pour 2026 (nouvelle lecture).
Vote on one part of a finance bill or social security financing bill. The organic laws governing these texts require their parts to be examined in order: the next one cannot be debated before this one is adopted.
AdoptedFor 166Against 140Abstention 32Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 259Against 1Abstention 64Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 121Against 196Abstention 4Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 125Against 192Abstention 5Members of the SOC group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 196Against 111Abstention 5Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 206Against 4Abstention 72Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 200Against 25Abstention 68Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 129Against 97Abstention 49Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 171Against 63Abstention 28Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 178Against 64Abstention 21Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 84Against 96Abstention 72Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 75Against 77Abstention 103Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 180Against 67Abstention 7Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 177Against 72Abstention 8Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 50Against 101Abstention 102Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 75Against 98Abstention 72Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 161Against 97Abstention 5Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 117Against 67Abstention 54Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 145Against 63Abstention 15Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 144Against 63Abstention 18Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 93Against 65Abstention 86Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 105Against 83Abstention 39Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 106Against 79Abstention 46Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 224Against 25Abstention 2Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 107Against 136Abstention 6Members of the SOC group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 150Against 117Abstention 0Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 114Against 146Abstention 4Members of the SOC group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 151Against 118Abstention 2Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 78Against 156Abstention 27Members of the SOC group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 185Against 10Abstention 69Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 275Against 2Abstention 0Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 72Against 160Abstention 8Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
RejectedFor 78Against 160Abstention 0Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 189Against 0Abstention 55Members of the SOC group that day -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
AdoptedFor 110Against 62Abstention 5Members of the SOC group that day -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
AdoptedFor 91Against 43Abstention 0Members of the SOC group that day