Votes of Valérie Bazin-Malgras

Every public vote held during the mandate, with the recorded position.

8,434 votes match.

• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3934Group that day : DR
  l'article 8 du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Their vote : For (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3933Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 25 de Mme Dalloz à l'article 8 du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  According to its authors : L'article 8 du PLFG pour 2025 augmente de 323 ETPT le plafond d'emplois des opérateurs. En raison de l'état dégradé de nos finances publiques et de l'impérieuse nécessité pour l'État de rationaliser ses dépenses de…

  Their vote : For (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3932Group that day : DR
  l'article 7 et Etat D du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Their vote : For (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3931Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 10 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy à l'article 7 et Etat D du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3930Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 11 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy à l'article 7 et Etat D du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3929Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 12 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy à l'article 7 et Etat D du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3928Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 115 de M. Metzdorf à l'article 7 et Etat D du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3927Group that day : DR
  l'article 6 et Etat C du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Their vote : For (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3926Group that day : DR
  l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Their vote : For (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3925Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 91 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3924Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 90 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3923Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 89 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3922Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 128 de la commission des finances à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3921Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 88 de M. Le Coq et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3920Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 92 de M. Le Coq et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3919Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 86 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3918Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 85 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3917Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 84 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3916Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 83 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3915Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 112 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3914Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 82 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3913Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 123 de Mme Arrighi à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3912Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 81 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3911Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 80 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3910Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 126 de Mme Arrighi à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3909Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 79 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3908Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 4 de Mme Sas à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3907Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 69 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3906Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 5 de Mme Sas à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3905Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 7 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3904Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 78 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3903Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 77 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3902Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 76 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3901Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 1 de Mme Sas à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3900Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 15 de M. Renault à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3899Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 2 de Mme Sas et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3898Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 74 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3897Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 6 de M. Renault à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3896Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 43 de M. Ben Cheikh à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3895Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 40 de Mme Diop et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3894Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 129 de Mme Minard à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3893Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 103 de M. Jean-René Cazeneuve à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3892Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 67 de M. Le Coq à l'article 5 et Etat B du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3891Group that day : DR
  la première partie du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  Vote on one part of a finance bill or social security financing bill. The organic laws governing these texts require their parts to be examined in order: the next one cannot be debated before this one is adopted.

  Their vote : For (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3890Group that day : DR
  l'article 4 et Etat A du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Their vote : For (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3889Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 13 de M. Renault à l'article 4 et Etat A du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3888Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 131 du Gouvernement à l'article 4 et Etat A du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  According to its authors : Le présent amendement a pour objet de traduire, dans le tableau relatif à l’équilibre du budget de l’État, l’incidence des amendements retenus dans le cadre de l’examen de la première partie du projet de loi de finances…

  Their vote : For (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3887Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 18 de Mme Duby-Muller et les amendements identiques suivants après l'article 3 du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  According to its authors : Le présent amendement vise à faire en sorte que les dépenses décidées par l’État et imposées aux collectivités soient compensées, singulièrement pour les Départements dont la plupart des dépenses ne sont pas pilotables…

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3886Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 16 de Mme Duby-Muller et les amendements identiques suivants après l'article 3 du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  According to its authors : Pour les collectivités à compétences départementales, la situation financière atteint son niveau le plus critique depuis 2010. Cette dégradation résulte d’un effet ciseaux particulièrement marqué : d’une part…

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 November 2025Vote no. 3885Group that day : DR
  l'amendement n° 21 de Mme Duby-Muller et les amendements identiques suivants après l'article 3 du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025 (première lecture).

  According to its authors : Le 25 juin 2024, un accord a été agréé par le Gouvernement afin d’étendre la prime « Ségur » à l’ensemble des professionnels non concernés dans le secteur sanitaire, social et médico-social privé à but non lucratif…

  Their vote : Against (by delegation)Result : Adopted