Votes of Timothée Houssin
Every public vote held during the mandate, with the recorded position.
9,459 votes match.
-
According to its authors : Dans la continuité de la suppression du malus écologique sur les véhicules des SDIS votée en 2023, cet amendement propose également, de supprimer le « malus écologique » (CO2 et poids) pour l’ensemble des véhicules de…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
According to its authors : Cet amendement vise à supprimer progressivement, entre 2026 et 2028, le tarif réduit pour les charbons consommés dans les installations grandes consommatrices d’énergie exploitées par les entreprises énergo-intensives…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Les entreprises de l’agroalimentaire, en particulier les PME et ETI à faibles marges, traversent une période critique marquée par l’érosion de leur rentabilité, l’obsolescence de leurs outils de production et la…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : "Cet amendement de repli du groupe LFI prévoit la réduction de la niche fiscale sur l’utilisation du gaz pour la production de légumes hors saison, employé principalement pour chauffer des serres. La production de…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Cet amendement présenté en commun par les groupes de la gauche et de l’écologie vise à supprimer l’exemption de taxation du kérosène, dès 2026, pour les vols domestiques en dehors de la Corse ou des outre-mer. Plus…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : L’article L.312-53 du code des impositions sur les biens et services (CIBS), créé par l’ordonnance n°2021-1843 du 22 décembre 2021, prévoit un remboursement partiel de l’accise sur les énergies pour le gazole utilisé…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Cet amendement propose de fixer une trajectoire progressive de diminution du tarif réduit sur le gazole pour le transport routier de marchandises avec l’objectif d’atteindre un niveau équivalent au tarif normal…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : La libéralisation du marché européen de l’électricité et du gaza imposé l’émergence d’entreprises qui ont réalisé des bénéfices importants sur le marché français sans avoir contribué à la création, l’entretien et le…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : "Cet amendement du groupe parlementaire de La France insoumise introduit une taxe « usage unique » sur les producteurs de plastiques à usage unique. Depuis 1950, le monde a produit 9,2 milliards de tonnes de plastique…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Le présent amendement vise d’une part, à rendre obligatoire l’identifiant unique pour tous les producteurs, y compris étrangers, afin de lutter contre la fraude et d’inciter les producteurs notamment étrangers, à…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
According to its authors : Amendement d’appel L’hydroélectricité est la seconde source de production électrique française, derrière le nucléaire, avec une production annuelle comprise entre 50 et 70 TWh. Cette filière emploie 25 000 personnes et…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : "Par cet amendement, la France Insoumise propose de supprimer la niche fiscale soutenant le secteur des biocarburants de 1ere génération, soit des carburants (tels que le biogazole, le bioéthanol...) produits à partir…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Les pollutions aux PFAS entraînent un coût économique important pour la collectivité (2,274 milliards d'euros -a minima- par an pour la France). Ce coût est supporté par l'ensemble de la population. Comme nous le…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : La pollution de l’air représente un enjeu majeur de santé publique, responsable d’environ 40 000 décès prématurés chaque année selon Santé publique France, et un coût économique évalué à près de 100 milliards d’euros…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : La pollution de l’air demeure un enjeu majeur de santé publique et de cohésion territoriale, responsable d’environ 40 000 morts prématurées chaque année selon Santé publique France et d’un coût économique estimé à 100…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Cet amendement des députés insoumis propose de supprimer la réduction de TGAP des dons des entreprises à destination des associations. L’utilisation de cette niche fiscale par les entreprises est peu contrôlée et…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Par cet amendement, nous souhaitons alerter le Gouvernement sur l'urgence sanitaire et environnementale en matière de gestion des déchets dans les territoires dits d'outre-mer, qui continuent de souffrir d'un retard…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : La pollution de l’air constitue un enjeu majeur de santé publique et de soutenabilité économique. Elle est responsable d’environ 40 000 morts prématurées chaque année en France selon Santé publique France, et son coût…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Cet amendement s’inscrit dans la continuité du travail effectué par le groupe Rassemblement National lors des précédents examens des projets de loi de finances, qui ont tous été sous la précédente législature obérés par…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Cet amendement propose de réserver à la Collectivité de Corse la fraction du produit de la taxe générale sur les activités polluantes (TGAP) « déchets » collectée sur le territoire corse. En 2019, l’Assemblée de Corse a…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Cet amendement des députés socialistes et apparentés vise à instaurer une « TGAP Amont » sur les produits en plastique mis sur le marché qui n’entrent dans aucune filière de responsabilité élargie des producteurs ou de…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Selon le Service des données et études statistiques (SDES), en 2022, les ménages français dépensaient en moyenne 1 744€ en énergie par an dans un contexte d’augmentation du prix de l’énergie. Dans la perspective…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Cet amendement propose de supprimer l’acompte de 40 % du montant des redevances pour pollution diffuses. L’article L.213-11-12-1 du code de l'environnement oblige les entreprises de négoce agricole à payer avant le 30…
Their vote : ForResult : Rejected -
Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).
Their vote : AgainstResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : AbstentionResult : Adopted -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
Their vote : AgainstResult : Adopted -
According to its authors : L'article 8 du PLFG pour 2025 augmente de 323 ETPT le plafond d'emplois des opérateurs. En raison de l'état dégradé de nos finances publiques et de l'impérieuse nécessité pour l'État de rationaliser ses dépenses de…
Their vote : ForResult : Rejected -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
Their vote : AgainstResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : ForResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : ForResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : ForResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : ForResult : Rejected -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
Their vote : AgainstResult : Rejected -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : AbstentionResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : AbstentionResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : AbstentionResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : ForResult : Adopted -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : AgainstResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : ForResult : Adopted -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : ForResult : Adopted -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : AgainstResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : ForResult : Adopted -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : AbstentionResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : AbstentionResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : AgainstResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : AbstentionResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : AbstentionResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : AbstentionResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : AgainstResult : Rejected