Votes of Léa Balage El Mariky

Every public vote held during the mandate, with the recorded position.

9,459 votes match.

• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5509Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 151 de M. Clouet et l'amendement identique suivant de rétablissement de l'article 20 sexies (supprimé) de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5508Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 162 (rect.) de M. Clouet à l'article 20 bis A de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5507Group that day : ECOS
  l'article 19 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5506Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 7 de Mme Dombre Coste et les amendements identiques suivants à l'article 19 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5505Group that day : ECOS
  l'article 18 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5504Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 64 de Mme Dogor-Such à l'article 18 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5503Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 78 de Mme Erodi à l'article 18 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5502Group that day : ECOS
  l'article 17 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5501Group that day : ECOS
  l'article 16 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5500Group that day : ECOS
  l'article 15 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5499Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 66 de Mme Lingemann à l'article 15 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5498Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 143 de M. Monnet et l'amendement identique suivant de rétablissement de l'article 14 bis (supprimé) de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5497Group that day : ECOS
  l'article 14 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5496Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 63 de Mme Dogor-Such et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 14 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5495Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 122 de Mme Mansouri à l'article 14 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5494Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 205 de M. Bentz à l'article 14 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5493Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 62 de Mme Dogor-Such et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 14 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5492Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 211 de Mme Abadie-Amiel à l'article 14 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5491Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 61 de Mme Dogor-Such et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 14 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5490Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 83 de Mme Erodi à l'article 14 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5489Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 46 de Mme Loir à l'article 14 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5488Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 81 de M. Clouet à l'article 14 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5487Group that day : ECOS
  l'article 13 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5486Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 158 de Mme Leboucher à l'article 13 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5485Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 60 de Mme Dogor-Such à l'article 13 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5484Group that day : ECOS
  l'article 12 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5483Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 135 de Mme Lebon et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 12 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5482Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 121 de Mme Mansouri à l'article 11 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5481Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 58 de Mme Dogor-Such à l'article 11 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 18 February 2026Vote no. 5480Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 59 de Mme Dogor-Such à l'article 11 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5479Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 219 du Gouvernement à l'article 10 (supprimé) de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5478Group that day : ECOS
  le sous-amendement n° 229 de Mme Dombre Coste à l'amendement n° 219 du Gouvernement à l'article 10 (supprimé) de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5477Group that day : ECOS
  le sous-amendement n° 222 de Mme Pollet à l'amendement n° 219 du Gouvernement à l'article 10 (supprimé) de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5476Group that day : ECOS
  le sous-amendement n° 224 de Mme Dombre Coste et les sous-amendements identiques suivants à l'amendement n° 219 du Gouvernement à l'article 10 (supprimé) de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5475Group that day : ECOS
  l'article 8 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5474Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 92 de M. Clouet à l'article 8 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5473Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 91 de Mme Erodi et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 8 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5472Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 128 de M. Monnet et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 7 bis (supprimé) de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5471Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 88 de Mme Erodi à l'article 7 bis (supprimé) de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5470Group that day : ECOS
  l'article 7 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5469Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 86 de M. Pilato à l'article 7 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5468Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 41 de Mme Loir à l'article 7 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5467Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 39 de Mme Loir et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 7 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5466Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 40 de Mme Loir à l'article 7 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5465Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 131 de M. Neuder à l'article 7 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5464Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 57 de Mme Dogor-Such à l'article 7 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5463Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 42 de Mme Loir à l'article 7 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5462Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 146 de Mme Firmin Le Bodo de suppression de l'article 7 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5461Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 48 de Mme Loir et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 6 bis (supprimé) de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 17 February 2026Vote no. 5460Group that day : ECOS
  l'amendement n° 4 de Mme Dombre Coste et les amendements identiques suivants à l'article 5 (supprimé) de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected