Votes of Laurent Jacobelli

Every public vote held during the mandate, with the recorded position.

9,459 votes match.

• 4 February 2026Vote no. 5309Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 20 de Mme Le Grip à l'article unique de la proposition de résolution européenne visant à rejeter le projet d’accord sur les droits de douane et le commerce du 27 juillet 2025 entre l’Union européenne et les États-Unis.

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 4 February 2026Vote no. 5308Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 19 de Mme Le Grip à l'article unique de la proposition de résolution européenne visant à rejeter le projet d’accord sur les droits de douane et le commerce du 27 juillet 2025 entre l’Union européenne et les États-Unis.

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 4 February 2026Vote no. 5307Group that day : RN
  l'article unique de la proposition de résolution européenne appelant à la préservation des principes démocratiques, des libertés publiques et de l’État de droit en Turquie.

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 4 February 2026Vote no. 5306Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 8 de Mme Chikirou à l'article unique de la proposition de résolution européenne appelant à la préservation des principes démocratiques, des libertés publiques et de l’État de droit en Turquie.

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 4 February 2026Vote no. 5305Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 1 de M. Sother à l'article unique de la proposition de résolution européenne appelant à la préservation des principes démocratiques, des libertés publiques et de l’État de droit en Turquie.

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 4 February 2026Vote no. 5304Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 10 de M. Mazaury à l'article unique de la proposition de résolution européenne appelant à la préservation des principes démocratiques, des libertés publiques et de l’État de droit en Turquie.

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 4 February 2026Vote no. 5303Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 11 de de la commission des affaires étrangères et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article unique de la proposition de résolution européenne appelant à la préservation des principes démocratiques, des libertés publiques et de l’État de droit en Turquie.

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 4 February 2026Vote no. 5302Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 9 de M. Mazaury à l'article unique de la proposition de résolution européenne appelant à la préservation des principes démocratiques, des libertés publiques et de l’État de droit en Turquie.

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 4 February 2026Vote no. 5301Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 3 de M. Saint-Martin à l'article unique de la proposition de résolution européenne appelant à la préservation des principes démocratiques, des libertés publiques et de l’État de droit en Turquie.

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 3 February 2026Vote no. 5300Group that day : RN
  l'article unique de la proposition de résolution européenne visant à soutenir le Danemark et le Groenland et à œuvrer en faveur d'une plus grande coopération en matière de défense.

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : ForResult : Adopted
• 3 February 2026Vote no. 5299Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 13 de Mme Catherine Hervieu à l'article unique de la proposition de résolution européenne visant à soutenir le Danemark et le Groenland et à œuvrer en faveur d'une plus grande coopération en matière de défense.

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 3 February 2026Vote no. 5298Group that day : RN
  l'article unique de la proposition de résolution européenne visant à sauvegarder et renforcer le financement en faveur de la lutte contre le virus de l'immunodéficience humaine.

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 3 February 2026Vote no. 5297Group that day : RN
  la proposition de résolution demandant la libération des prisonniers arméniens détenus par l'Azerbaïdjan (article 34-1 de la Constitution).

  A resolution states the position of the Assembly on a question; it does not have the binding force of a law.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 3 February 2026Vote no. 5296Group that day : RN
  l'ensemble du projet de loi relatif à l'organisation des jeux Olympiques et Paralympiques de 2030 (texte de la commission mixte paritaire).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : ForResult : Adopted
• 3 February 2026Vote no. 5295Group that day : RN
  la motion de rejet préalable, déposée par Mme Mathilde Panot, du projet de loi relatif à l'organisation des jeux Olympiques et Paralympiques de 2030 (texte de la commission mixte paritaire).
  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to… Read moreShow less

  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to reject the text without examining it.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 2 February 2026Vote no. 5294Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 9 de Mme Chatelain à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à améliorer la protection des commerçants grâce à l'usage d'outils numériques (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 2 February 2026Vote no. 5293Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 15 de M. Rancoule à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à améliorer la protection des commerçants grâce à l'usage d'outils numériques (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 2 February 2026Vote no. 5292Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 31 de M. Midy et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à améliorer la protection des commerçants grâce à l'usage d'outils numériques (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 2 February 2026Vote no. 5291Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 32 de M. Midy et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à améliorer la protection des commerçants grâce à l'usage d'outils numériques (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 2 February 2026Vote no. 5290Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 8 de Mme Chatelain à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à améliorer la protection des commerçants grâce à l'usage d'outils numériques (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 2 February 2026Vote no. 5289Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 27 de M. Boudié à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à améliorer la protection des commerçants grâce à l'usage d'outils numériques (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 2 February 2026Vote no. 5288Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 2 de Mme Élisa Martin à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à améliorer la protection des commerçants grâce à l'usage d'outils numériques (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 2 February 2026Vote no. 5287Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 1 de M. Coulomme et les amendements identiques suivants de suppression de l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à améliorer la protection des commerçants grâce à l'usage d'outils numériques (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 2 February 2026Vote no. 5286Group that day : RN
  la motion de rejet préalable, déposée par Mme Mathilde Panot, de la proposition de loi visant à améliorer la protection des commerçants grâce à l'usage d'outils numériques (première lecture).
  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to… Read moreShow less

  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to reject the text without examining it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 2 February 2026Vote no. 5285Group that day : RN
  la motion de censure déposée en application de l'article 49, alinéa 3, de la Constitution par Mme Marine Le Pen, M. Éric Ciotti et 104 députés.
  This motion of censure answers the Government making a text a matter of confidence (article 49, paragraph 3, of the Constitution). Only the votes for are recorded. If it is not adopted, the text is considered adopted… Read moreShow less

  This motion of censure answers the Government making a text a matter of confidence (article 49, paragraph 3, of the Constitution). Only the votes for are recorded. If it is not adopted, the text is considered adopted; if it is, by an absolute majority of the members of the Assembly, the text is rejected and the Government must resign (article 50).

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 2 February 2026Vote no. 5284Group that day : RN
  la motion de censure déposée en application de l'article 49, alinéa 3, de la Constitution par M. Stéphane Peu, Mme Mathilde Panot, Mme Cyrielle Chatelain et 110 députés.
  This motion of censure answers the Government making a text a matter of confidence (article 49, paragraph 3, of the Constitution). Only the votes for are recorded. If it is not adopted, the text is considered adopted… Read moreShow less

  This motion of censure answers the Government making a text a matter of confidence (article 49, paragraph 3, of the Constitution). Only the votes for are recorded. If it is not adopted, the text is considered adopted; if it is, by an absolute majority of the members of the Assembly, the text is rejected and the Government must resign (article 50).

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5283Group that day : RN
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5282Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 91 de Mme Maximi après l'article 7 bis de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5281Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 109 de Mme Hamelet après l'article 5 de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5280Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 107 de Mme Hamelet à l'article 4 de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5279Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 41 de Mme Santiago à l'article 2 de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5278Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 100 de Mme Hamelet après l'article premier de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5277Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 79 de Mme Maximi après l'article premier de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5276Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 87 (rect.) de Mme Loir après l'article premier de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5275Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 102 de Mme Hamelet à l'article premier de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5274Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 81 de Mme Loir à l'article premier de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5273Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 75 de Mme Maximi à l'article premier de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5272Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 101 de Mme Hamelet à l'article premier de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5271Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 80 de Mme Loir à l'article premier de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5270Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 99 de Mme Hamelet à l'article premier de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5269Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 71 de Mme Hadizadeh à l'article premier de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5268Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 98 de Mme Hamelet à l'article premier de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5267Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 89 de Mme Maximi à l'article premier de la proposition de loi relative à l'intérêt des enfants (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5266Group that day : RN
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi visant à reconnaître les victimes de l'exposition aux essais nucléaires français et à améliorer leur indemnisation (première lecture).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5265Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 3 de M. Laisney après l'article 6 bis de la proposition de loi visant à reconnaître les victimes de l'exposition aux essais nucléaires français et à améliorer leur indemnisation (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5264Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 2 de M. Laisney après l'article 6 bis de la proposition de loi visant à reconnaître les victimes de l'exposition aux essais nucléaires français et à améliorer leur indemnisation (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5263Group that day : RN
  l'article 6 bis de la proposition de loi visant à reconnaître les victimes de l'exposition aux essais nucléaires français et à améliorer leur indemnisation (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5262Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 5 de Mme Reid Arbelot à l'article 6 bis de la proposition de loi visant à reconnaître les victimes de l'exposition aux essais nucléaires français et à améliorer leur indemnisation (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5261Group that day : RN
  l'article 6 de la proposition de loi visant à reconnaître les victimes de l'exposition aux essais nucléaires français et à améliorer leur indemnisation (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 29 January 2026Vote no. 5260Group that day : RN
  l'article 4 de la proposition de loi visant à reconnaître les victimes de l'exposition aux essais nucléaires français et à améliorer leur indemnisation (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted