Votes of Katiana Levavasseur

Every public vote held during the mandate, with the recorded position.

9,459 votes match.

• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6159Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 48 de M. Marion à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6158Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 52 de M. Michelet à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6157Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 36 de M. Gumbs à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6156Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 33 de Mme Joubert à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6155Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 42 de Mme Sebaihi à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6154Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 30 de M. Pribetich et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6153Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 37 de M. Coquerel à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6152Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 29 de M. Pribetich à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6151Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 3 de M. Arenas et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6150Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 51 de M. Larrouquis à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6149Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 22 de Mme Taillé-Polian à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6148Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 25 de M. Aurélien Taché à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6147Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 12 de Mme Taillé-Polian à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6146Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 47 de Mme Sebaihi à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6145Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 11 de Mme Taillé-Polian et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6144Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 31 de M. Pribetich à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6143Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 43 de M. Michelet à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6142Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 34 de M. Marion à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6141Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 2 de M. Aurélien Taché à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6140Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 1 de M. Aurélien Taché à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6139Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 21 (rect.) de Mme Taillé-Polian à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6138Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 44 de Mme Sebaihi à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6137Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 39 de Mme Sebaihi et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 13 April 2026Vote no. 6136Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 18 (rect.) de Mme Taillé-Polian à l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à la restitution de biens culturels provenant d’États qui, du fait d’une appropriation illicite, en ont été privés (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 10 April 2026Vote no. 6135Group that day : RN
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi visant à instaurer une procédure simplifiée de recouvrement des créances commerciales incontestées (première lecture).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 10 April 2026Vote no. 6134Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 1 de M. Arnaud Bonnet à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à instaurer une procédure simplifiée de recouvrement des créances commerciales incontestées (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 10 April 2026Vote no. 6133Group that day : RN
  la motion de rejet préalable, déposée par Mme Dubré-Chirat, de la proposition de loi visant à permettre aux salariés de certains établissements et services de travailler le 1er mai (première lecture).
  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to… Read moreShow less

  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to reject the text without examining it.

  Position : ForResult : Adopted
• 10 April 2026Vote no. 6132Group that day : RN
  la demande de suspension de séance formulée par M. Lachaud (proposition de loi visant à permettre aux salariés de certains établissements et services de travailler le 1er mai) (première lecture).

  Procedural vote on the conduct of the sitting; it is not about the substance of the text.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6131Group that day : RN
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi visant à simplifier la gestion de la commande publique par les acheteurs publics et les opérateurs économiques (première lecture).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6130Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 2 de M. Salmon après l'article 3 de la proposition de loi visant à simplifier la gestion de la commande publique par les acheteurs publics et les opérateurs économiques (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6129Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 16 du Gouvernement à l'article 1er bis de la proposition de loi visant à simplifier la gestion de la commande publique par les acheteurs publics et les opérateurs économiques (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6128Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 23 de Mme Catherine Hervieu après l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à simplifier la gestion de la commande publique par les acheteurs publics et les opérateurs économiques (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6127Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 22 de Mme Catherine Hervieu après l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à simplifier la gestion de la commande publique par les acheteurs publics et les opérateurs économiques (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6126Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 20 de Mme Catherine Hervieu après l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à simplifier la gestion de la commande publique par les acheteurs publics et les opérateurs économiques (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6125Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 15 du Gouvernement à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à simplifier la gestion de la commande publique par les acheteurs publics et les opérateurs économiques (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6124Group that day : RN
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6123Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 58 de M. Raux à l'article 3 de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6122Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 62 de M. Raux à l'article 3 de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AbstentionResult : Adopted
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6121Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 57 de M. Raux à l'article 3 de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Adopted
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6120Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 34 de M. Boyard et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6119Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 7 de M. Christophle et les amendements identiques suivants de suppression de l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6118Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 31 de M. Boyard après l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6117Group that day : RN
  l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : ForResult : Adopted
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6116Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 39 de Mme Ranc à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6115Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 21 de M. Boyard à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6114Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 32 de M. Kerbrat à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6113Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 55 de M. Raux à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6112Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 28 de M. Boyard à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6111Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 6 de M. Christophle et les amendements identiques suivants à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 9 April 2026Vote no. 6110Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 29 de M. Kerbrat à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à renforcer la pénalisation de l’organisation de rave-parties (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Adopted