Votes of Joëlle Mélin

Every public vote held during the mandate, with the recorded position.

9,459 votes match.

• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6459Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 688 de Mme Youssouffa à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6458Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 670 de Mme Florence Goulet à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6457Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 673 de Mme Florence Goulet à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6456Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 611 de M. Bloch à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6455Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 693 de M. Gonzalez à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6454Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 612 de M. Bloch à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6453Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 357 de Mme Catherine Hervieu à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6452Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 341 de Mme Catherine Hervieu à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6451Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 342 de Mme Catherine Hervieu à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6450Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 340 de Mme Catherine Hervieu à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6449Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 215 de M. Cormier-Bouligeon à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6448Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 128 de M. Giletti à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6447Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 531 de M. Limongi à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6446Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 592 de M. Jacobelli à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6445Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 530 de M. Limongi à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6444Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 539 de M. Limongi à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6443Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 686 de M. Gonzalez à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6442Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 290 de Mme Colombier à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6441Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 301 de Mme Catherine Hervieu à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6440Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 219 de M. Cormier-Bouligeon à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6439Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 595 de M. Tonussi à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6438Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 516 de M. Limongi à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6437Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 687 de M. Gonzalez à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6436Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 736 (rect.) de M. Cormier-Bouligeon à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6435Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 713 de Mme Catherine Hervieu à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6434Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 657 de Mme Chatelain à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6433Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 537 de M. Limongi à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6432Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 450 de Mme Pouzyreff à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6431Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 198 de M. Lachaud à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6430Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 746 (rect.) de Mme Catherine Hervieu à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6429Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 544 de M. Limongi à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6428Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 197 de M. Lachaud à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6427Group that day : RN
  le sous-amendement n° 768 de M. Saintoul à l'amendement n° 197 de M. Lachaud à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment. Read moreShow less

  A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6426Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 529 de M. Limongi à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6425Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 504 de Mme Rimbert à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6424Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 737 de Mme Catherine Hervieu à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6423Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 602 de M. Tonussi à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6422Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 189 de M. Saintoul à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6421Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 533 de M. Limongi à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6420Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 597 de M. Tonussi à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6419Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 186 de M. Lachaud à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6418Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 185 de M. Lachaud à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6417Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 134 de M. Giletti à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6416Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 181 de M. Lachaud à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6415Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 132 de M. Giletti à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6414Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 586 de M. Tonussi à l'article premier et rapport annexé du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole. Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  The content of this amendment could not be tied without ambiguity to the amendments published by the National Assembly: it can be read on the official page of the vote.

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6413Group that day : RN
  l'article 19 du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  Article 19, committee text no. 2695 : I. – Est soumise au présent article toute personne qui, d’une part, exerce une activité professionnelle dans des locaux ou sur des terrains où la libre circulation est interdite au titre de l’article 413‑7 du code pénal… Read moreShow less

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Article 19, committee text no. 2695: text before its examination in the sitting

  I. – Est soumise au présent article toute personne qui, d’une part, exerce une activité professionnelle dans des locaux ou sur des terrains où la libre circulation est interdite au titre de l’article 413‑7 du code pénal lorsqu’une telle interdiction vise à empêcher que des éléments essentiels du potentiel scientifique ou technique de la Nation soient détournés à des fins de terrorisme ou de prolifération d’armes de destruction massive et de leurs vecteurs et qui, d’autre part, dispose d’une expérience significative et d’un savoir‑faire technique ou de connaissances présentant un niveau d’importance critique.

  Le présent article ne s’applique pas :

  1° Aux agents mentionnés aux articles L. 4122‑11 et L. 4122‑13 du code de la défense dont la situation est régie par ces mêmes articles L. 4122‑11 et L. 4122‑13 ;

  2° Aux personnes ayant accès aux locaux et aux terrains mentionnés au premier alinéa du présent I dans le cadre :

  a) D’un contrat doctoral ;

  b) D’un contrat postdoctoral ;

  c) D’un contrat d’attaché temporaire d’enseignement et de recherche.

  Official text, in French.

  Read more

  The text on the National Assembly website · How this official content is tied to the vote

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6412Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 321 de M. Iordanoff à l'article 19 du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  According to its authors : Cet amendement du groupe Ecologiste et Social vise à instaurer une procédure contradictoire préalable à l’inscription sur la liste des personnes soumises au dispositif. En l’état du texte, l’inscription sur cette liste… Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  • Amendment no. 321
  • Bears on: Article 19

  Summary statement, written by the authors of the amendment

  Cet amendement du groupe Ecologiste et Social vise à instaurer une procédure contradictoire préalable à l’inscription sur la liste des personnes soumises au dispositif.

  En l’état du texte, l’inscription sur cette liste intervient sans que les personnes concernées ne soient mises à même de faire valoir leurs observations, alors même qu’elle entraîne l’application d’obligations et de restrictions particulièrement contraignantes.

  Cet amendement permet donc aux personnes concernées de présenter leurs observations préalablement à leur inscription et de disposer d’un moyen effectif de contestation distinct du seul recours juridictionnel a posteriori.

  Official text, in French.

  Provision: the proposed change to the text

  Compléter la dernière phrase de l’alinéa 8 par les mots :

  « , après une procédure contradictoire, de la décision prise ».

  Official text, in French.

  The amendment on the National Assembly website · How this official content is tied to the vote

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6411Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 441 de Mme Pic à l'article 19 du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  According to its authors : Cet amendement du groupe Socialistes et apparentés vise à exclure tous les personnels exerçant une activité de recherche au sein d’un établissement d’enseignement supérieur de l’obligation déclarative prévue au I du… Read moreShow less

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  • Amendment no. 441
  • Bears on: Article 19

  Summary statement, written by the authors of the amendment

  Cet amendement du groupe Socialistes et apparentés vise à exclure tous les personnels exerçant une activité de recherche au sein d’un établissement d’enseignement supérieur de l’obligation déclarative prévue au I du présent article.

  Dans sa rédaction actuelle, l’article 19 prévoit l’exclusion des doctorants, post doctorants et attaché temporaire d’enseignement et de recherche (ATER), de l’obligation déclarative susmentionnée. Or, tel n’est pas le cas des autres personnels de l’enseignement supérieur ayant une activité de recherche, tels que les Professeurs des universités.

  Cette situation est perçue par les principaux concernés comme une atteinte à la liberté académique, laquelle a valeur constitutionnelle depuis sa reconnaissance comme principe fondamental reconnu par les lois de la République en 1984.

  Certains qu’il ne s’agit pas de l’intention initiale du Gouvernement, le présent amendement lui propose de réparer cet oubli.

  Official text, in French.

  Provision: the proposed change to the text

  Après l’alinéa 7, insérer l’alinéa suivant :

  « d) D’une activité de recherche liée à une activité professionnelle réalisée dans le cadre d’un contrat avec un établissement d’enseignement supérieur. »

  Official text, in French.

  The amendment on the National Assembly website · How this official content is tied to the vote

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 7 May 2026Vote no. 6410Group that day : RN
  l'article 18 du projet de loi actualisant la programmation militaire pour les années 2024 à 2030 et portant diverses dispositions intéressant la défense (première lecture).
  Article 18, committee text no. 2695 : I. ‒ L’article L. 851‑3 du code de la sécurité intérieure est ainsi rédigé : « Art. L. 851‑3. – I. – Dans les conditions prévues au chapitre Ier du titre II du présent livre et pour les seules finalités prévues aux 1°… Read moreShow less

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Article 18, committee text no. 2695: text before its examination in the sitting

  I. ‒ L’article L. 851‑3 du code de la sécurité intérieure est ainsi rédigé :

  « Art. L. 851‑3. – I. – Dans les conditions prévues au chapitre Ier du titre II du présent livre et pour les seules finalités prévues aux 1°, 2°, 4° et 6° de l’article L. 811‑3, à la demande des services spécialisés de renseignement mentionnés à l’article L. 811‑2, peuvent être autorisés, sur les données transitant par les réseaux des opérateurs et des personnes mentionnés à l’article L. 851‑1, des traitements automatisés destinés, en fonction de paramètres précisés dans l’autorisation, à détecter des connexions susceptibles de révéler des ingérences étrangères, des menaces pour la défense nationale, des menaces terroristes ou des menaces relatives à la criminalité organisée et à la délinquance organisée portant sur des délits punis de dix ans d’emprisonnement en tant qu’elles concernent le trafic de stupéfiants, le trafic d’armes et de produits explosifs, l’importation et l’exportation de ces marchandises prohibées ainsi que le blanchiment et le recel du produit, des revenus et des choses provenant de ces infractions.

  Official text, in French.

  Read more

  The text on the National Assembly website · How this official content is tied to the vote

  Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted