Votes of Frédéric Petit
Every public vote held during the mandate, with the recorded position.
9,459 votes match.
-
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
Vote on one part of a finance bill or social security financing bill. The organic laws governing these texts require their parts to be examined in order: the next one cannot be debated before this one is adopted.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Le présent amendement a pour objet de traduire, dans le tableau relatif à l’équilibre du budget de l’État, l’incidence des amendements retenus dans le cadre de l’examen de la première partie du projet de loi de finances…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
According to its authors : Le présent amendement vise à faire en sorte que les dépenses décidées par l’État et imposées aux collectivités soient compensées, singulièrement pour les Départements dont la plupart des dépenses ne sont pas pilotables…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Pour les collectivités à compétences départementales, la situation financière atteint son niveau le plus critique depuis 2010. Cette dégradation résulte d’un effet ciseaux particulièrement marqué : d’une part…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Le 25 juin 2024, un accord a été agréé par le Gouvernement afin d’étendre la prime « Ségur » à l’ensemble des professionnels non concernés dans le secteur sanitaire, social et médico-social privé à but non lucratif…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
According to its authors : Le présent amendement vise à faire en sorte que les dépenses décidées par l’État et imposées aux collectivités soient compensées, singulièrement pour les Départements dont la plupart des dépenses ne sont pas pilotables…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Pour les collectivités à compétences départementales, la situation financière atteint son niveau le plus critique depuis 2010. Cette dégradation résulte d’un effet ciseaux particulièrement marqué : d’une part…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
According to its authors : Le projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion (PLFG) pour 2025 prévoit une nouvelle réduction des ressources publiques affectées au réseau des Chambres de Commerce et d’Industrie (CCI), premier réseau d’établissements…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
According to its authors : Le présent amendement vise à minorer de 500 000 euros la hausse prévue à l’article 1er du projet de loi de finances de fin de gestion pour 2025, relative au montant de la fraction de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée affectée…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Le Haut Conseil des finances publiques, dans son avis du 31 octobre 2025, estime que la trajectoire budgétaire 2025 repose sur des hypothèses globalement plausibles, mais souligne plusieurs fragilités majeures qui ne…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : "Par cet amendement de repli, le groupe LFI souhaite assurer l’existence de planchers non nuls pour les prélèvements sur la ressource en eau, comme ça aurait dû être le cas dès 2024, si les macronistes n’avaient pas…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : "Par cet amendement, le groupe LFI souhaite augmenter les planchers et les plafonds des différents usages donnant lieu à des prélèvements sur la ressource en eau. Cet amendement s’inscrit dans la continuité des mesures…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Conformément aux annonces du plan Eau et à la version initiale du Projet de loi de Finances pour l’année 2024, le présent amendement propose de renforcer la redevance pour pollutions diffuses, établie selon les…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Cet amendement du groupe Écologiste et Social vise à augmenter de 50 % les taux de la redevance pour pollutions diffuses (RPD). Le principe « pollueur-payeur » est un élément primordial de la lutte et de l’adaptation…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Dans le prolongement du « plan eau » annoncé par le Président de la République le 30 mars 2023, le présent amendement a pour objet d’adapter, à compter du 1er janvier 2026, la fiscalité aux enjeux environnementaux…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : "Par cet amendement, le groupe parlementaire de la France insoumise souhaite ajouter les produits contenant des substances per et polyfluoroalkylées (PFAS), des micropolluants et des microplastiques à la liste des…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Les redevances payées par les industriels aux agences de l’eau ont été profondément modifiées par l’article 101 de la loi des finances pour 2024, entrée en vigueur au 1er janvier 2025, sans étude d’impact ni…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : L’article L. 213‑10‑4 du code de l’environnement, entré en vigueur le 1er janvier 2025, définit le fait générateur de la redevance sur la consommation d’eau comme étant la facturation du prix de l’eau. Cette…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Avec cet amendement, il est proposé de rééquilibrer la hausse des redevances payées par les industriels aux agences de l’eau. Depuis l’article 101 du PLF 2024, les redevances des agences de l’eau ont fortement augmenté…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
According to its authors : Le présent amendement vise à rendre opérationnel le dispositif de taxation des substances perfluoroalkylées et polyfluoroalkylées (PFAS), prévu à l’article 4 de la loi n° 2025-188 du 27 février 2025 visant à protéger la…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Adopted -
According to its authors : Le présent sous-amendement vise reporter d’un an la date d’entrée en vigueur de la redevance prévu à l’article 4 de la loi n° 2025-188 du 27 février 2025 visant à protéger la population des risques liés aux substances…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Il faut bien comprendre que supprimer la réforme de 2025 des redevances des agences de l’eau, dont les effets se révèlent inefficaces, complexes et pénalisants est nécessaire avant tout. Cette réforme a effectivement…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : Le présent amendement vise à supprimer le régime fiscal dérogatoire dont bénéficient les installations de production d’électricité d’origine photovoltaïque mises en service après le 1er janvier 2021, au titre de…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : L’objectif de cet amendement est d’augmenter le montant de l’imposition forfaitaire sur les entreprises de réseaux (IFER) applicable aux parcs éoliens hors éolien maritime dans les eaux intérieures, la mer territoriale…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected -
According to its authors : L’article 1519 D du Code général des impôts institue une imposition forfaitaire sur les installations terrestres de production d’électricité utilisant l’énergie mécanique du vent. Fixée à 8,51 € par kilowatt installé…
Their vote : No position recordedResult : Rejected