Votes of Florent Boudié

Every public vote held during the mandate, with the recorded position.

8,417 votes match.

• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4417Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 224 de M. Gery après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4416Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 223 de M. Gery après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4415Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 222 de M. Gery après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4414Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 220 de M. Sabatou après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4413Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 221 de Mme Lebec après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4412Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 212 de M. Boulogne après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4411Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 211 de M. Boulogne après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4410Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 210 de M. Boulogne après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4409Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 209 de M. Boulogne après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4408Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 208 de M. Boulogne après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4407Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 207 de M. Boulogne après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4406Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 206 de M. Boulogne après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4405Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 205 de M. Boulogne après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4404Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 202 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4403Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 201 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4402Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 200 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4401Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 197 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4400Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 196 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4399Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 42 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4398Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 195 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4397Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 187 de Mme Ménaché après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4396Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 129 de M. Jacobelli après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4395Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 124 de M. Jacobelli après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4394Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 64 de Mme Pollet après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4393Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 190 de M. Golliot après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4392Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 44 de M. Mauvieux après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4391Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 43 de M. Mauvieux après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4390Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 29 de Mme Lebec après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4389Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 28 de Mme Lebec après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4388Group that day : EPR
  le sous-amendement n° 351 de M. Boccaletti à l'amendement n° 28 de Mme Lebec après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4387Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 27 de Mme Lebec après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4386Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 9 de M. Sitzenstuhl après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4385Group that day : EPR
  le sous-amendement n° 347 de M. Boccaletti à l'amendement n° 9 de M. Sitzenstuhl après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4384Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 160 de M. Dessigny après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4383Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 95 de M. Bernhardt après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4382Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 267 de M. Fayssat après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4381Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 66 de Mme Pollet après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4380Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 97 de M. Bernhardt de suppression après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4379Group that day : EPR
  le sous-amendement n° 406 de M. Carbonnel à l'amendement n° 97 de M. Bernhardt après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4378Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 215 de Mme Lebec de suppression de l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4377Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 136 de M. Jenft après l'article premier bis de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4376Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 105 de M. Bernhardt après l'article premier bis de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4375Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 96 de M. Bernhardt après l'article premier bis de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4374Group that day : EPR
  le sous-amendement n° 371 de M. Verny à l'amendement n° 96 de M. Bernhardt après l'article premier bis de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4373Group that day : EPR
  le sous-amendement n° 372 de M. Verny à l'amendement n° 96 de M. Bernhardt après l'article premier bis de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4372Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 214 de Mme Lebec et l'amendement identique suivant de suppression de l'article premier bis de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4371Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 247 de M. Baubry après l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4370Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 186 de M. Dessigny après l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4369Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 185 de M. Dessigny après l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 27 November 2025Vote no. 4368Group that day : EPR
  l'amendement n° 184 de M. Dessigny après l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à la nationalisation d'ArcelorMittal France afin de préserver la souveraineté industrielle de la France (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected