Votes of Elie Califer

Every public vote held during the mandate, with the recorded position.

9,459 votes match.

• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5759Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 963 de Mme Taillé-Polian à l'article 5 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5758Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 143 de Mme Corneloup et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 5 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5757Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 380 de Mme Feld à l'article 5 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5756Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 132 de Mme Thiébault-Martinez à l'article 5 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5755Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 44 de Mme Runel à l'article 5 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5754Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 676 de M. Coquerel à l'article 5 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5753Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 946 de M. Boyard à l'article 5 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5752Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 369 de M. Boyard à l'article 5 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5751Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 225 de M. Monnet et les amendements identiques suivants de suppression de l'article 5 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5750Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 891 de Mme Vidal de suppression de l'article 8 bis (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5749Group that day : SOC
  l'article 8 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5748Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 565 de M. Meurin à l'article 8 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5747Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 563 de M. Meurin à l'article 8 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5746Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 400 de Mme Feld à l'article 8 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5745Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 24 de Mme Lebon à l'article 8 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5744Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 265 de M. Hetzel et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 8 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5743Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 564 de M. Meurin à l'article 8 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5742Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 888 de Mme Vidal à l'article 8 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5741Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 446 de Mme Runel à l'article 8 (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5740Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 804 de Mme Arrighi à l'article 3 quinquies (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5739Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 595 de M. Maurel à l'article 3 quater (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5738Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 483 de M. Labaronne et l'amendement identique suivant de suppression de l'article 3 quater (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5737Group that day : SOC
  l'article 2 bis (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5736Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 39 de Mme Runel et l'amendement identique suivant de suppression de l'article 2 bis (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5735Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 607 de Mme Colin-Oesterlé à l'article 2 bis A (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5734Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 18 de de Mme Lebon et les amendements identiques suivants de suppression de l'article 2 bis A (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 26 February 2026Vote no. 5733Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 479 de de M. Labaronne de suppression de l'article 1er ter (examen prioritaire) du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 25 February 2026Vote no. 5732Group that day : SOC
  la motion de rejet préalable, déposée par Mme Mathilde Panot, du projet de loi relatif à la lutte contre les fraudes sociales et fiscales (première lecture).
  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to… Read moreShow less

  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to reject the text without examining it.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 25 February 2026Vote no. 5731Group that day : SOC
  la motion de censure, déposée en application de l'article 49, alinéa 2, de la Constitution, par Mme Mathilde Panot et 57 députés.
  A motion of censure challenges the responsibility of the Government (article 49, paragraph 2, of the Constitution). Only the votes for are recorded. It is adopted only by an absolute majority of the members of the… Read moreShow less

  A motion of censure challenges the responsibility of the Government (article 49, paragraph 2, of the Constitution). Only the votes for are recorded. It is adopted only by an absolute majority of the members of the Assembly; the Government must then resign (article 50).

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected

  For a motion of censure, only votes for are recorded. Not being on the list does not mean voting against.

• 25 February 2026Vote no. 5730Group that day : SOC
  la motion de censure, déposée en application de l'article 49, alinéa 2, de la Constitution, par M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy et 59 députés.
  A motion of censure challenges the responsibility of the Government (article 49, paragraph 2, of the Constitution). Only the votes for are recorded. It is adopted only by an absolute majority of the members of the… Read moreShow less

  A motion of censure challenges the responsibility of the Government (article 49, paragraph 2, of the Constitution). Only the votes for are recorded. It is adopted only by an absolute majority of the members of the Assembly; the Government must then resign (article 50).

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected

  For a motion of censure, only votes for are recorded. Not being on the list does not mean voting against.

• 25 February 2026Vote no. 5729Group that day : SOC
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (deuxième lecture).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : AgainstResult : Adopted
• 25 February 2026Vote no. 5728Group that day : SOC
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi visant à garantir l'égal accès de tous à l'accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs (deuxième lecture).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : ForResult : Adopted
• 25 February 2026Vote no. 5727Group that day : SOC
  l'article 9 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (seconde délibération) (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : AgainstResult : Adopted
• 25 February 2026Vote no. 5726Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 5 de M. Valletoux à l'article 9 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (seconde délibération) (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 25 February 2026Vote no. 5725Group that day : SOC
  l'article 6 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (seconde délibération) (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : AgainstResult : Adopted
• 25 February 2026Vote no. 5724Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 4 de M. Valletoux à l'article 6 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (seconde délibération) (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 25 February 2026Vote no. 5723Group that day : SOC
  l'article 4 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (seconde délibération) (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 25 February 2026Vote no. 5722Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 8 de M. Hetzel à l'article 4 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (seconde délibération) (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 25 February 2026Vote no. 5721Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 1 du Gouvernement et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 4 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (seconde délibération) (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 25 February 2026Vote no. 5720Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 3 de M. Valletoux à l'article 2 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (seconde délibération) (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 25 February 2026Vote no. 5719Group that day : SOC
  le sous-amendement n° 6 de Mme Gruet à l'amendement n° 3 de M. Valletoux à l'article 2 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (seconde délibération) (deuxième lecture).

  A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 24 February 2026Vote no. 5718Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 273 de M. Bazin au titre de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 24 February 2026Vote no. 5717Group that day : SOC
  l'article 19 bis de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 24 February 2026Vote no. 5716Group that day : SOC
  l'article 19 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 24 February 2026Vote no. 5715Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 1245 de Mme de Maistre à l'article 19 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 24 February 2026Vote no. 5714Group that day : SOC
  l'article 18 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 24 February 2026Vote no. 5713Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 394 de Mme Gruet et les amendements identiques suivants à l'article 18 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 24 February 2026Vote no. 5712Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 220 de Mme Dogor-Such et les amendements identiques suivants à l'article 18 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 24 February 2026Vote no. 5711Group that day : SOC
  l'article 16 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (deuxième lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 24 February 2026Vote no. 5710Group that day : SOC
  l'amendement n° 506 de Mme Mansouri et les amendements identiques suivants de suppression de l'article 16 de la proposition de loi relative au droit à l'aide à mourir (deuxième lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected