Votes of Béatrice Roullaud

Every public vote held during the mandate, with the recorded position.

9,459 votes match.

• 16 December 2025Vote no. 4759Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 159 de M. Coulomme de suppression de l'article premier du projet de loi relatif à l'organisation des jeux Olympiques et Paralympiques de 2030 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 16 December 2025Vote no. 4758Group that day : RN
  l'ensemble du projet de loi de financement de la sécurité sociale pour 2026 (lecture définitive).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 16 December 2025Vote no. 4757Group that day : RN
  la motion de rejet préalable, déposée par Mme Mathilde Panot, du projet de loi de financement de la sécurité sociale pour 2026 (lecture définitive).
  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to… Read moreShow less

  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to reject the text without examining it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 15 December 2025Vote no. 4756Group that day : RN
  la motion de rejet préalable, déposée par Mme Mathilde Panot, du projet de loi relatif à l'organisation des jeux Olympiques et Paralympiques de 2030 (première lecture).
  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to… Read moreShow less

  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to reject the text without examining it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4755Group that day : RN
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi visant à prendre des mesures d'urgence contre la vie chère en outre-mer dans le secteur des services (première lecture).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4754Group that day : RN
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi visant à garantir un renouvellement automatique des titres de séjour de longue durée (première lecture).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : AgainstResult : Adopted
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4753Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 16 de M. Jacobelli après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir un renouvellement automatique des titres de séjour de longue durée (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4752Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 15 de M. Jacobelli après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir un renouvellement automatique des titres de séjour de longue durée (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4751Group that day : RN
  le sous-amendement n° 32 de M. Tonussi à l'amendement n° 15 de M. Jacobelli après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir un renouvellement automatique des titres de séjour de longue durée (première lecture).

  A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4750Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 14 de M. Jacobelli après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir un renouvellement automatique des titres de séjour de longue durée (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4749Group that day : RN
  l'amendement de suppression n° 5 de M. Gery à l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à garantir un renouvellement automatique des titres de séjour de longue durée (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4748Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 12 de M. Jacobelli à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à garantir un renouvellement automatique des titres de séjour de longue durée (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4747Group that day : RN
  le sous-amendement n° 33 de M. Tonussi à l'amendement n° 12 de M. Jacobelli à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à garantir un renouvellement automatique des titres de séjour de longue durée (première lecture).

  A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4746Group that day : RN
  l'amendement de suppression n° 1 de M. Pauget et les amendements identiques suivants à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à garantir un renouvellement automatique des titres de séjour de longue durée (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4745Group that day : RN
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : AgainstResult : Adopted
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4744Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 41 de M. Kasbarian et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 2 de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4743Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 47 de M. Vos après l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4742Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 46 de M. Vos après l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4741Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 17 (rect.) de M. Echaniz après l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Adopted
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4740Group that day : RN
  l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : AgainstResult : Adopted
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4739Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 42 de M. Ciotti à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AbstentionResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4738Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 11 de M. Falcon à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4737Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 20 de M. Falcon à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4736Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 10 de M. Falcon à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4735Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 19 de M. Falcon à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4734Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 30 de Mme Nosbé à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4733Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 23 de Mme Le Meur à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AbstentionResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4732Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 9 de M. Falcon à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4731Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 43 de M. Ciotti à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4730Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 24 de Mme Belouassa-Cherifi à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4729Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 8 de M. Falcon à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4728Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 18 de M. Falcon à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4727Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 22 de Mme Le Meur à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4726Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 44 de M. Ciotti à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4725Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 35 de Mme Létard à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4724Group that day : RN
  l'amendement de suppression n° 40 de M. Kasbarian à l'article premier de la proposition de loi pour retrouver la confiance et l'équilibre dans les rapports locatifs (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4723Group that day : RN
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi visant à protéger les mineurs isolés et à lutter contre le sans-abrisme (première lecture).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : AgainstResult : Adopted
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4722Group that day : RN
  l'article 3 de la proposition de loi visant à protéger les mineurs isolés et à lutter contre le sans-abrisme (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : AgainstResult : Adopted
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4721Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 46 de Mme Hamelet après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à protéger les mineurs isolés et à lutter contre le sans-abrisme (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4720Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 48 de M. Emmanuel Grégoire à l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à protéger les mineurs isolés et à lutter contre le sans-abrisme (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Adopted
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4719Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 10 de Mme Simonnet et l'amendement identique suivant après l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à protéger les mineurs isolés et à lutter contre le sans-abrisme (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Adopted
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4718Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 26 de M. Boyard après l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à protéger les mineurs isolés et à lutter contre le sans-abrisme (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4717Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 27 de Mme Mesmeur après l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à protéger les mineurs isolés et à lutter contre le sans-abrisme (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4716Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 47 de M. Emmanuel Grégoire à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à protéger les mineurs isolés et à lutter contre le sans-abrisme (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Adopted
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4715Group that day : RN
  l'amendement de suppression n° 16 de Mme D'Intorni à l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à protéger les mineurs isolés et à lutter contre le sans-abrisme (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4714Group that day : RN
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi visant à assurer le droit de chaque enfant à être assisté d'un avocat dans le cadre d'une mesure d'assistance éducative et de protection de l'enfance (première lecture).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : ForResult : Adopted
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4713Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 12 de Mme Josserand au titre de la proposition de loi visant à assurer le droit de chaque enfant à être assisté d'un avocat dans le cadre d'une mesure d'assistance éducative et de protection de l'enfance (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4712Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 6 (rect.) de M. Tonussi après l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à assurer le droit de chaque enfant à être assisté d'un avocat dans le cadre d'une mesure d'assistance éducative et de protection de l'enfance (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4711Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 5 de M. Moulliere à l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à assurer le droit de chaque enfant à être assisté d'un avocat dans le cadre d'une mesure d'assistance éducative et de protection de l'enfance (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : AgainstResult : Rejected
• 11 December 2025Vote no. 4710Group that day : RN
  l'amendement n° 7 de M. Tonussi à l'article 2 de la proposition de loi visant à assurer le droit de chaque enfant à être assisté d'un avocat dans le cadre d'une mesure d'assistance éducative et de protection de l'enfance (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : ForResult : Rejected