Votes of Béatrice Bellamy

Every public vote held during the mandate, with the recorded position.

6,899 votes match.

• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3099Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 1545 de Mme Lejeune après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3098Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 2169 de Mme Lejeune après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3097Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 368 de M. Le Fur après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3096Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 269 de M. Wauquiez après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3095Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 3074 de M. Lahais après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3094Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 1648 de M. Coquerel après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3093Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 2 de M. Grenon et les amendements identiques suivants après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3092Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 774 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy et l'amendement identique suivant après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3091Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 892 de M. Lottiaux après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3090Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 3607 de M. Seo après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3089Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 618 de M. Wauquiez et l'amendement identique suivant après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3088Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 102 de M. Renault après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3087Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 776 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3086Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 2157 de M. Le Coq après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3085Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 775 de M. Chenu après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3084Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 1803 de Mme Yadan après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3083Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 2025 de Mme Garin après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3082Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 258 de Mme Thiébault-Martinez après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3081Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 2088 de Mme Chikirou après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 25 October 2025Vote no. 3080Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 1615 de Mme Rixain et l'amendement identique suivant après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Abstention (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3079Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 2863 de Mme Garin après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3078Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 217 de M. Arnaud Bonnet après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3077Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 1700 (rect.) de Mme Rixain et l'amendement identique suivant après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3076Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 1705 de M. Coquerel après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3075Group that day : HOR
  le sous-amendement n° 3804 de Mme Coggia à l'amendement n° 1705 de M. Coquerel après l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  A sub-amendment proposes to change an amendment before the amendment is put to the vote. Voting for means wanting this change in the amendment.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3074Group that day : HOR
  l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : For (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3073Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 1467 de Mme Lejeune à l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3072Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 3358 de M. Mattei à l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3071Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 628 de M. Philippe Brun et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3070Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 2099 de Mme Mercier à l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3069Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement de suppression n° 290 de M. Ciotti et l'amendement identique suivant à l'article 2 du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3068Group that day : HOR
  l'article premier du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : For (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3067Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 3536 de M. Renault avant l'article premier du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3066Group that day : HOR
  l'article liminaire du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : For (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3065Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 1535 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy à l'article liminaire du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3064Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 1536 de M. Jean-Philippe Tanguy à l'article liminaire du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3063Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement de suppression n° 1493 de Mme Feld à l'article liminaire du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 24 October 2025Vote no. 3062Group that day : HOR
  la motion de rejet préalable, déposée par Mme Mathilde Panot, du projet de loi de finances pour 2026 (première lecture).
  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to… Read moreShow less

  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to reject the text without examining it.

  Position : Against (by delegation)Result : Rejected
• 23 October 2025Vote no. 3061Group that day : HOR
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi modifiant la définition pénale du viol et des agressions sexuelles (texte de la commission mixte paritaire).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : For (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 22 October 2025Vote no. 3060Group that day : HOR
  la motion de rejet préalable, déposée par MM. Vincent Caure et Nicolas Metzdorf, de la proposition de loi organique visant à reporter le renouvellement général des membres du congrès et des assemblées de province de la Nouvelle-Calédonie pour permettre la mise en œuvre de l'accord du 12 juillet 2025 (première lecture).
  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to… Read moreShow less

  A motion for prior rejection asks for the text to be rejected before its articles are examined. Adopted, it rejects the text (article 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly). Voting for means wanting to reject the text without examining it.

  Position : For (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 16 October 2025Vote no. 3059Group that day : HOR
  la motion de censure déposée en application de l'article 49, alinéa 2, de la Constitution par Mme Marine Le Pen, M. Éric Ciotti et 56 députés.
  A motion of censure challenges the responsibility of the Government (article 49, paragraph 2, of the Constitution). Only the votes for are recorded. It is adopted only by an absolute majority of the members of the… Read moreShow less

  A motion of censure challenges the responsibility of the Government (article 49, paragraph 2, of the Constitution). Only the votes for are recorded. It is adopted only by an absolute majority of the members of the Assembly; the Government must then resign (article 50).

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected

  For a motion of censure, only votes for are recorded. Not being on the list does not mean voting against.

• 16 October 2025Vote no. 3058Group that day : HOR
  la motion de censure déposée en application de l'article 49, alinéa 2, de la Constitution par Mme Mathilde Panot et 86 députés.
  A motion of censure challenges the responsibility of the Government (article 49, paragraph 2, of the Constitution). Only the votes for are recorded. It is adopted only by an absolute majority of the members of the… Read moreShow less

  A motion of censure challenges the responsibility of the Government (article 49, paragraph 2, of the Constitution). Only the votes for are recorded. It is adopted only by an absolute majority of the members of the Assembly; the Government must then resign (article 50).

  Position : No position recordedResult : Rejected

  For a motion of censure, only votes for are recorded. Not being on the list does not mean voting against.

• 15 October 2025Vote no. 3057Group that day : HOR
  l'article unique du projet de loi autorisant la ratification de la convention n° 155 sur la sécurité et la santé des travailleurs, 1981 (première lecture).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : No position recordedResult : Adopted
• 15 October 2025Vote no. 3056Group that day : HOR
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi de simplification du droit de l'urbanisme et du logement (texte de la commission mixte paritaire).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : ForResult : Adopted
• 15 October 2025Vote no. 3055Group that day : HOR
  l'ensemble du projet de loi portant transposition des accords nationaux interprofessionnels en faveur de l'emploi des salariés expérimentés et relatif à l'évolution du dialogue social (texte de la commission mixte paritaire).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : ForResult : Adopted
• 8 September 2025Vote no. 3054Group that day : HOR
  la déclaration de politique générale du Gouvernement de M. François Bayrou (application de l'article 49, alinéa premier, de la Constitution).
  The Government stakes its responsibility on its programme or on a general policy statement (article 49, first paragraph, of the Constitution). If the Assembly disapproves it, the Prime Minister must tender the… Read moreShow less

  The Government stakes its responsibility on its programme or on a general policy statement (article 49, first paragraph, of the Constitution). If the Assembly disapproves it, the Prime Minister must tender the resignation of the Government (article 50).

  Position : ForResult : Rejected
• 10 July 2025Vote no. 3053Group that day : HOR
  l'ensemble de la proposition de loi visant à encourager, à faciliter et à sécuriser l'exercice du mandat d'élu local (première lecture).

  Vote on the text as a whole, after its articles have been examined, at the stage of the procedure given in brackets (first reading, text of the joint committee…).

  Position : For (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 10 July 2025Vote no. 3052Group that day : HOR
  l'article premier de la proposition de loi visant à encourager, à faciliter et à sécuriser l'exercice du mandat d'élu local (première lecture)(seconde délibération).

  Each article of the text is put to the vote, as changed by the amendments adopted before this vote. Adopted, it stays in the text; rejected, it is removed from it.

  Position : For (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 10 July 2025Vote no. 3051Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 863 de la commission des lois au titre de la proposition de loi portant création d'un statut de l'élu local (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : For (by delegation)Result : Adopted
• 10 July 2025Vote no. 3050Group that day : HOR
  l'amendement n° 784 de Mme Firmin Le Bodo au titre de la proposition de loi portant création d'un statut de l'élu local (première lecture).

  An amendment proposes to change the text under discussion. Voting for means wanting it in the text; voting against means refusing it. On its own, this vote does not say what the deputy thinks of the text as a whole.

  Position : For (by delegation)Result : Rejected